Under følger viktige dommer fra saker avgjort i ECHR og Høyesterett.
ECHR saker:STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAYSTRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY Conc. Opinion KO. and VM. v. NORWAY ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY AS. v. NORWAY PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY.pdf HERNEHULT v. NORWAY.pdf M.L. v. NORWAY.pdf FZ. v. NORWAY.pdf KE. AND AK. v. NORWAY.pdf RO. v. NORWAY.pdf MANTOVANELLI v. France ONODI v. HUNGARY EH. v NORWAY MF. v. NORWAY ABDI IBRAHIM 2 v. NORWAY (art.8) JANSEN v. NORWAY (art.8) ADELE JOHANSEN v. NORWAY (art.8) BARNEA AND CALDARARU v. ITALY D.R. AND OTHERS v.NORWAY - 12.09.2023! D.R. v. Norway (Bosnia and Herzegovina) D.J. AND P.J. v. Norway (Frogner bv) K.F. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY - 12.09.2023! K.F AND A.F v. Norway S.E AND T.E v. Norway (Sylvia/Trond Ensby) M.A AND M.A. v. Norway G.B. v. Norway G.G. v. Norway L.S. AND O.V. v. Norway S.S. AND J.H. v. NORWAY - 12.09.2023! IMPROTA v. ITALY (barnefordeling) A. AND OTHERS v. ITALY (barnefordeling) MARCKX v. BELGIUM TUOMELA AND OTHERS v. FINNLAND (Ytringsfrihet art. 10) OLSSON v. SWEDEN (art. 8) Høyesterett storkammer 27.03.2020:HR-2020-661-SHR-2020-662-S HR-2020-663-S Høyesterett, andre kjennelser : HR-2020-1789-a Barne og Familiedepartementet :Rundskriv BFD 10.6.2020Tolkning av Høyesterett og EMD sine føringer. Særlig vektlagt er at barnevernet nå må begrunne vurderinger faglig. Ikke utømt rettsmidler/"Manifestly ill-founded"/No violationBODNARIU v. NORWAY (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, inadmissible) A.A. v. NORWAY (manifestly ill-founded, inadmissible) S.P. v. NORWAY (manifestly ill-founded, inadmissible) E.M. & T.A. v. NORWAY (manifestly ill-founded, inadmissible) O.S. v. NORWAY (admissible,no violation of Article 8) EMD 14.09.2023 (Mail fra ECHR)
HERNEHULT v. NORWAY (manifestly ill-founded, inadmissible) |
Støtt vårt arbeide |
Vipps "Gave" |
Konto 9803 16 30355 |
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2020 - 2024 Versjon 2023-10-01 (C) Rune Fardal